Friday, October 26, 2012

Romney Changes Colours but the President Remains Black throughout the Campaign

It is shameful and even pitiful to see how Mr. Romney has changed his colours throughout the campaign. He is like a chameleon. He dances to whatever tune is playing and does so with impunity. Can you trust a President who does not know his own mind? I think not.
President Obama has been consistent. He stood his ground and told people what he believed in and why.
Unfortunately, Mr. Romney appears to want power and will do anything, say anything to get it.  It's all about him.
America you give President Obama four more years to solidify his gain otherwise you are going to be in deep  s...t.
VOTE OBAMA FOR FOUR MORE YEARS. HE IS A PRESIDENT YOU CAN TRUST FOR HE TAKES CARE OF THE WEAKEST LINK IN THE CHAIN WHICH IS WHAT IS NEEDED TO MAKE THE ECONOMY STRONGER.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/24/1149319/-Romney-s-record-in-Massachusetts



Wed Oct 24, 2012 at 06:42 AM PDT

Romney's record in Massachusetts

by ybrutiFollow
Romney claims that as governor of Massachusetts he was able to work well with a Democratic legislature. To refute this, I have written a short letter to the editor that might be useful for people writing their own letters. The information comes from a column submitted to the Denver Post by a resident of Massachusetts, Marsha Mirkin, whom I've quoted below the squiggle. I received her column as a viral email with the heading: He will say whatever is necessary to get elected.

My letter:

Romney poses as the successful former governor of Massachusetts, but he left office after one term with a 31% approval rating, having entered the office with a 61% approval after seeming to be a fiscal and social moderate. Contrary to his claim that he got along well with the Democratic legislature, he vetoed proposed legislation a record 800 times, and most of his vetoes were overriden, sometimes unanimously. For example, he vetoed a budget amendment to stop contracting with companies that outsourced state work to other countries. He vetoed emergency contraception. He vetoed a bill to fund stem cell research which as a candidate he had favoured. He vetoed bills that would have strengthened preschool education. From his record in Massachusetts, we can expect that as president, Romney would revert to the "severely conservative" he has called himself.

The viral email:

Here I am, a resident of Massachusetts listening to my former Governor speak convincingly and with seeming conviction at the Denver debate. I was startled by my déjà vu experience and by the assumptions held by my out-of-town friends about Mr. Romney’s governorship. So, as an editor and author of articles and texts about social and political contexts, I wanted to reach out to my distant neighbours in Colorado and share my understanding of Mr. Romney’s governorship and the implications for the Presidency. Massachusetts is known as a liberal state, but we often vote for Republican governors, and the three governors who immediately preceded Mr. Romney were Republicans. Mr. Romney was a one term governor who left office with a 31% approval rating, the 3rd lowest in the entire country. What does our experience in Massachusetts say to the country?

Mr. Romney claims to have experience reaching across the aisle. Maybe he did do some reaching, but not much of it went toward the Democrats. In his first two years of office, he vetoed legislation at more than twice the rate of Republican predecessor Governor Weld. Governor Romney had a record 800 vetoes (most of which were overturned, sometimes unanimously). One example is when the legislature provided a budget amendment to stop contracting with companies that outsource state work to other countries. Governor Romney vetoed the provision. This meant that he supported outsourcing jobs at the expense of U.S. workers. He also started a huge campaign to unseat Democratic legislators, but failed and ended up with even fewer Republican seats than before he took office.

Governor Romney correctly claims that Massachusetts rose to #1 in education — but it was based on former Governor Weld’s education reform plan. Governor Romney moved in the opposite direction--he vetoed bills that would have strengthened preschool education.

However, the issue is not so much how he voted, but that Mr. Romney won the governorship by presenting himself in one way, as a social and fiscal moderate (some saw him as a social progressive), and by the end of his single term, he had acted in an entirely different way. He said during his campaign that he favoured stem cell research and then vetoed a bill to fund it. He argued for a lower minimum wage than the state legislature ended up passing (over his veto). He vetoed a bill funding hate crimes prevention, and took back money approved by a former Republican governor for a bullying prevention program. He denied all requests for commutations and pardons, including one from a soldier serving in Iraq whose was convicted at age 13 for a BB gun incident. He vetoed emergency contraception. He raised many fees in my state — even quadrupling the gasoline delivery fees.

Governor Romney certainly approved some pieces of legislation that I did support but that does not change a major problem: Mr. Romney re-created himself and changed his positions during the first Presidential debate in your city because he must sound more moderate in order to win the independent vote. After that, all bets are off. We in Massachusetts know all about that. We elected a governor expecting him to be one thing and then he did something totally different and got on the national stage. He entered the governorship with a 61% approval rating and left with an abysmal 31% and with many of us scratching our heads and wondering whom we elected. The difference between then and now is that you have Mr. Romney’s speeches and positions from this past year and the contradictions during the debate. You can get nonpartisan information from factcheck.org. And, you now know what he was like in Massachusetts. So, I hope the country doesn’t have to go through what Massachusetts went through. Regardless of your political beliefs, this constant turning into something we didn’t vote for is no way to run a state, never mind a country.

Marsha Mirkin, Wellesley, MA

Professor of psychology

Lasell College in MA

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Thank you President Obama You Did us all Proud

President Obama you made your point last evening. You stood your ground, you took time to explain to the American people the difference between you and Romney and what is at stake without the hype and drama as some people were pushing you to do.

America has to stop dreaming in Hollywood and know that voting for your next President is not a movie. It is real life.

On the other hand Mr Romney was his usual bullying self. His behaviour was anything by gentlemanly. He bullied the interviewer for more time, he pointed his fingers at Obama actually calling him a liar when he said he announced it was a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden.  For a moment I thought he would have pushed President Obama.  I think that kind of a behaviour is unbecoming for a person who wants to be President. It is clear that Mr. Romney will be quick to take American into another war if the chance presents itself.  For a former priest he does not seek peace.

President Obama's final response was powerful. Romney was very weak.  He might have fared better if he told the American people how he would raise all the money he intends to raise, how he would create millions of jobs, bring down the debt, lower taxes for everyone - where in tarnation would he get the money to do that?  I can also get up and say I would do this that the the other but when wait till I get into office you would see?  That is the most ridiculous proposition I have ever heard of a contender.  This man has thinks he is acting in a Hollywood movie or something.

I can sum up Mr. Romney in one sentence having paid attention to what he has been saying. He does not have a plan for the poor and middleclass America but he does have a solid plan for the rich people in American to become even richer.

On the other hand President Obama's plan is to continue on his plan to solidly put America back on the map, to be a Present of all America and to ensure the country no longer rides on the backs of the middleclass. Vote America, Vote Obama. A Vote for Romney means you want to return to the days that Mr. Bush left behind when everyone was running helter skelter as the economy bled as it has never bled before. Mr. Obama has a solid plan but Mr. Romney has no plan and as the saying goes
when you fail the plan you plan to fail

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Tonight's Debate

Many of President Obama's supporters and would be supporters are waiting to see him knock out Mitt Romney but I urge the President that he does not have to stoop to cheap tactics get the facts straight, tell it to the people once, tell them again and again.
It will not help any of them to have this back and forth rant like kids on a ball field or sparring for fun. This debate is not about looking good even though many want their president to be a lot of show and little substance.
This is the fight for survival for your daily bread and to feed and clothes your family. It is not a game. If people bury their hand in Hollywood fantasies, you will soon wake up with the collection man comes knocking at your door at 2:00 a.m. in the morning and you have no way of paying your bills because you have just lost your job. That is the Romney scenario.
You know where you are going with Barack Obama, he has laid it out for you clearly but Mr. Romney's plans are still being cooked and the ingredients change every day depending on whose coming to dinner.

I urge people do not vote on the strength of who looks or sounds better on TV - listen to the words of these people. Take notes, be critical and then decide to vote for President Obama - four more years - there is no better option at this time.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Even Fox News has called down Mitt Romney's new Maths

Romney does not know of what he speaks about Vote a man who does, Vote President Obama. Let Obama finished what he started.  If given a change he will make history as the President who like a David struck the heart of Goliath and slayed him. He will turn the economy around.
Americans, put your vote where your livelihood is, do not gamble with a change at this stage of the game. You will be turning back to what Obama picked up at the beginning of his tenure. It was not a pretty sight.
Many of the same people who are now saying vote Romney, did not believe that America would stand on its feet again so quickly but it did, so you must give credit to the man who brought it about and his incredible team.
Don't be fooled, don't risk your house again, your job and your children's future. Romney is aching to fight another battle using your children?
It should be mandatory for war mongering politicians must send their own children to war - maybe then they would not be so quick to want to go to war. Our children are dying for nothing. Stop all war, stop the war in the Middle east. America has no hope in hell to win any war within the Middle East. The war may subside for a little while but as soon as the soldier leaves, the people revert to their own ways. The solution to end any way in the Middle east must come from the people not from America.


http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/even-fox-calling-out-romney-dishonesty?

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Remember the Economic Collapse before Obama

Do not let political hype confuse you with what's at stake in this election. With Obama you know where you are headed - it is a slow but steady climb. Obama has made great gains for America during his four years of very challenging leadership even without the support of the Republicans. Go with what you know, the economy is yet too fragile to make any rash decisions.
A Romney win is a win for Wall street and the rich. Obama win is for middle class America and for the people on the lower end of the spectrum.
You want to be a footstool for the rich to climb higher? Then vote for Romney and that's what you will get.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

With a Romney Win America will face what they always feared - Communism

Do you ever wonder why some people hate the rich? It is precisely for the like of multimillionaire David Siegel of Westgate Resorts who threatened to fire all his staff if Obama wins? That's sounds like communism to me, surely a dictator whom you have to bribe with a vote to keep your job. How shameful?  I think the Republicans and their straight-laced Romney who has more hot air than a hot air balloon are running scared. The Republicans do not have a viable plan to take America anywhere but down for the poor and up for the rich who will have more ammunition to stick it to the poor like this man is doing right now.

Do you want to be slaves to rich people? After all who made them rich? They became rich because they have exploited the poor - paying pittance, no benefits, no medical insurance nothing but pocket the harvest of poor people's labour?  Do you want that kind of a government?  Then better sign up now in some soup kitchen.

Obama is the guy to help America out of the mess left to him by the Republicans? Do you forget so easily? Do you not remember what happened four years ago? How many of you lost your homes and everything you worked so hard for because of the greed of the rich folks?

America, do not be fooled by this shiny new Republican toy?  It is not the real thing. You are part of the 47% Republicans do not care about. Romney and Siegel are two of a kind - they want to win by any means necessary even if it means taking away poor people's choice of whom to vote for.

You have to vote Obama for four more years so that he can solidify the gains that the Republicans cannot derail if and when they take office.

Do not forget what we have been through. Remember the hard times and now the good times you are enjoying under Obama. He works hard for ordinary folks, he wants you to have the ability to see a doctor when you are sick and weak. VOTE OBAMA, down with ROMNEY and his rich cronies.

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Obama Working Hard for the People - Talk is cheap getting the work done is hard


The improvement lent ballast to Mr. Obama’s case that the economy is on the mend and threatened the central argument of Mitt Romney’s candidacy, that Mr. Obama’s failed stewardship is reason enough to replace him.
Employers added a modest 114,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported on Friday, but estimates for what had been disappointing gains in July and August were revised upward to more respectable levels.

Unemployment fell to 7.8 percent from 8.1 percent, crossing what had become a symbolic threshold in the campaign. Mr. Romney was deprived of a favorite line of attack, mocking the president for “43 straight months with unemployment above 8 percent.”
  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/06/business/economy/us-added-114000-jobs-in-september-rate-drops-to-7-8.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=